According to @CoinMarketCap, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin urged Zcash to resist token voting, warning that shifting away from its committee-based governance could erode the privacy coin’s core features, as highlighted in @CoinMarketCap’s X post. Zcash currently relies on committees and the Zcash Community Advisory Panel rather than coin-weighted voting for funding and roadmap decisions, as outlined by the Zcash Foundation’s governance documentation. Buterin has previously argued that coin voting can be vulnerable to plutocratic capture and short-termism, reinforcing his caution for ZEC governance, as detailed in his essay Moving beyond coin voting governance on the Vitalik Buterin blog. For traders, any move toward token voting would be a material governance catalyst for ZEC because it impacts treasury control and privacy roadmap oversight, making headline monitoring of Zcash proposals and foundation announcements prudent, based on the roles described by the Zcash Foundation and the signal flagged by @CoinMarketCap.

According to @VitalikButerin, Zcash should resist token voting because he considers token voting worse than the project’s status quo and warns that privacy would erode under median token holder preferences, source: Vitalik Buterin on X, 2025-11-30, twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1995063062165135675. Zcash’s current governance relies on the Zcash Improvement Proposal process and the Zcash Foundation’s Community Advisory Panel for sentiment polling rather than token-weighted on-chain voting, so any move toward token voting would surface via ZIP drafts and ZF announcements, source: Zcash Foundation governance page zfnd.org/governance and Zcash Improvement Proposals site zips.z.cash. For traders, this identifies governance design as a concrete catalyst path to watch for ZEC, with relevant proposals and ballots documented in ZIPs and CAP records, source: zfnd.org/governance and zips.z.cash.